Display:


NARAL (none / 0)

made a bad choice- Nancy should have stayed out of it. It WAS a poor decision. Why on earth would Obama need a NARAL endorsement now?

Nancy is a good leader, but a horrible political operative- always has been. I was there when she ran against Denny. He was a horrible, horrible candidate and even though it was close, she still lost- any other dem would have won. She doesn't know politics and now she has just dropped NARAL into a fight they didn't need to have.
by linc on Thu May 15, 2008 at 12:11:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL (none / 0)

Nancy is a dope ... why are you worried .. I guess you forget what happened in 2006 .. the state chapters .. and the national one can't keep on the same page .. they've had those problems for a long time .. besides .. Obama is the presumptive nominee ... so they decided the time is now to get on board .. big deal


John McCain: Bush right to veto kids health insurance expansion
by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:01:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL (none / 0)

It shouldn't be a fight. That it is shows how irrational some people are being.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:57:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Irrrational? (none / 0)

well, reason is COMPLETELY subjective if you ask this post-structuralist. If we want to question reason, we question all of it, including Nancy's.
by linc on Thu May 15, 2008 at 08:00:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]