No, I would not care to put myself in the middle of the poster argument with another poster.
I will and I am new and I don't know either the diarist or the target. I did a control F search in this diary and when I put in Alito, I came up with no hits.
How could NARAL support the guy who snubbed the filibuster of Alito. The same way Bush would never be removed from office, he should have been impeached. That filibuster of Alito should have happened and it should have appeared everywhere on the news whether or not it would have survived cloture. Obama walked away from it because he never really takes a stand. Amazing how you can be for change but never change anything.
Those decisions are mostly made in regards to the court of public opinion. See here:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/9 /30/102745/165/500/153069
by filling in as the proxy schoolmarm. No sense in playing coy now.
Well, I think my diary is about more than a single diary - its about a general tone. I didn't make it public to embarrass Alegre, I write it publically because I felt it substantively addressed issues in a way a "normal" diary would.
If you are looking to discuss substance than take the other posters name out of the title.
As long as it's there it's just a call out diary.
Is that a promise? If he changes it to "Dear X" will you then debate the merits of his point?
Done. I'd welcome any other thoughts.
You can still comment on the nature of Obama's pro-choice positions, the role of polarity, or anything you think I got wrong.
