Display:


Re: Revoked Privileges Show Clear Bias? (1.00 / 1)

see?  you are exhibiting exactly the type of behaviour that is making you lose you privileges.  you state the i am often less than courteous in posts, while sometimes i lose my patience - as we all do - very rarely are my posts as you state it - less than courteous.  disagreement is allowed, nastiness isnt.


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:04:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nastiness has its place (none / 0)


by lombard on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:11:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Revoked Privileges Show Clear Bias? (none / 0)

Nastiness is allowed, if you are a Clinton supporter. See: TeresaInPA.



McCain
by Black Anus on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:40:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Revoked Privileges Show Clear Bias? (1.00 / 1)

see?  calling people out - a no-no.


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:50:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Revoked Privileges Show Clear Bias? (none / 0)

Calling people out in a diary title is against the site rules. I am not calling TeresaInPA out in a diary title.



McCain
by Black Anus on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:02:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Revoked Privileges Show Clear Bias? (none / 0)

You have no idea what you're talking about. None of these users had their privileges removed for being trolled, or hide rating, merely because they recced pro Obama diaries, at a time MYDD wanted to make sure the rec list was pro Hillary.

It's not about discourtesy or bad behavior - there's been enough of that on both sides - but VOTE RIGGING and frankly SELECTIVE DISENFRANCHISEMENT

Ignore the facts. Enjoy the temporary bias. But as I've said to you before

If they removed your privileges, JUST because you supported Hillary, I'd be on this same page, fighting for you


Pointing to the inadequacies of John McCain
by duende on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:28:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]