Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me!

I have always been pro choice. I cannot imagine a day when I will not be. I, like many women before me have fought and won the battle for choice for decades. Just like many other issues that concern women, we have fought the battles and carried the banner and made many great advances.

It is now time for the younger generation to pick up those battles where we left off.

However I have other issues that concern me now as well. Healthcare, jobs, the mortgage crisis, terrorism, national security, the national debt, record bankruptcies, the list goes on and on and on. Right to choose no longer affects me but I would still not like to see it overturned. However I will not be blackmailed into supporting a candidate I do not think should be POTUS on that one issue. That would put me on the same level as all those BUSHBOTS who voted for him on the gay marriage issue.

Many times I have heard it's time for us to hand over the reigns to the next generation thats fine we can do that, but when we do that you must be prepared to accept the responsibility for your choices and your actions. If you choose nominate a candidate that does not speak to us on the issues that concern us, you cannot demand that we support him so that the right for you to choose, which we already gained for you, remains intact.

It's your turn you asked for it, you're going to get it. Now it is time for you to pick the mantle and fight for those things you think are important. You are adults now time to fight your own battles, some of us have other battles to fight. Be grateful at least we are leaving you with a better position on the issue than we started with. If you lose the battle because you chose a candidate that cannot garner enough support to win the election that is not my fault that is your own fault

Though I will not vote for McCain at this point I cannot vote for Obama either. I believe this Party is at a turning point. I may be time for those of us who have reached the moderate phase of our lives to think about banding with those Republicans who hate the way their party has catered to the religious right and form a moderate party. Maybe it's time for the party leaders to take a look at the situation and determine if this Party is in danger of flying just as far off the tracks as the other one. I don't know, but I do know that using Roe vs Wade to try and blackmail me for my vote won't work!



Display:


Don't vote. S'cool. (2.00 / 7)

Just don't go on about it anymore.

It is your right to do whatever you want with your political voice, but should you not choose to use it, please save the rest of us the trouble with having to hear about your silence.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:53:30 PM EST

Re: Don't vote. S'cool. (2.00 / 1)

At this point in time I have decided to use my political voice to point out to the numerous posters on this board that trying to hang Roe vs Wade over peoples heads and guilt them into supporting their candidate is really not a very effective practice. If you don't like what I have to say may I suggest you close your eyes whenever you come across anything I write, rather than trying to demand I not write it. After all that is such a Right Wing tactic telling someone not to voice their opinion because it isn't "Lock Step" with yours!


"RedStateLib-The condition of being a Liberal who finds themselves living in a state that never should have gone to Bush in 2000."
by RedstateLib on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:20:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't vote. S'cool. (2.00 / 3)

So, you want to base your vote on "Healthcare, jobs, the mortgage crisis, terrorism, national security, the national debt, record bankruptcies."

Explain to me how a vote for Obama would be different than a vote for Hillary on the majority of those issues?  I guess I just don't understand where you stand if you don't like Obama's platform, which by and large is exactly the same as Hillary's.

Not voting/voting for McCain would serve to advance the GOP platform, which is arguably quite terrible.  Especially when it comes to all of the key issues you listed above.


"We have said since Iowa that this is a race for delegates."
-Howard Wolfson
by belicheat on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:34:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (2.00 / 8)

Fine don't vote for Obama.  Why do you feel that you have to make sure that everyone knows?  Sounds like a little blackmail to me.


by Destiny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:53:44 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (none / 0)

See my above reply.


"RedStateLib-The condition of being a Liberal who finds themselves living in a state that never should have gone to Bush in 2000."
by RedstateLib on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:21:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: kill yourself (2.00 / 3)

That's a troll and completely and utterly unacceptable.  

To the OP, this shithead's views are not mine.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:54:23 PM EST

Nice language, name-calling (none / 0)

And you get two recommends for it. Wow Obama presidency is going to make our country a lovely place.


by catfish1 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:16:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

its ok, he's responding to (2.00 / 0)

a terrible post that threatened the diarist with death.


by 4justice on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:56:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice language, name-calling (2.00 / 0)

He was sticking up for the diarist.  I also down rated that horrible poster.  It has now been removed  


by Destiny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 10:40:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (2.00 / 3)

Blackmail? I think it's given as a reason to support Obama. If you
don't want to get behind the nominee then don't. I respect your diary and all you have done in your lifetime and this is a very personal desicion.

I hope you change your mind in the future.


Obama/Clark will CRUSH John McCain
by spacemanspiff on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:55:12 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to (2.00 / 4)

"It's your turn you asked for it, you're going to get it. Now it is time for you to pick the mantle and fight for those things you think are important. You are adults now time to fight your own battles, some of us have other battles to fight. Be grateful at least we are leaving you with a better position on the issue than we started with. If you lose the battle because you chose a candidate that cannot garner enough support to win the election that is not my fault that is your own fault"

You are correct, except for the portion of blame that goes to you for not voting in a way that furthers your own goals.  That is on your conscience, not mine.

But as for the rest, you are correct.  We've made a choice and now we get to deal with it.

Remember how backward you felt your parents' generation was?  Remember how out of touch you thought they were?

You were right.  Now think on that a little.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:56:24 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to (none / 0)

"Remember how backward you felt your parents' generation was?  Remember how out of touch you thought they were?

You were right.  Now think on that a little."

I never thought my Mother was backwards. My Mother was a true radical. She believed that the Armed Forces should have been integrated, not only with AA but with gays, before Harry Truman did. She supported a woman reproductive rights in the 1940's before it was popular. So I personally liked the Ideas of my Mothers generation at least those of liberal thinkers like her. See it was the Ideals fostered by many women of her generation that we were able to carry the banner and make realities. We didn't need to spit on the women like her in order to advance our causes and make ourselves feel progressive. We were progressive because we helped them see those causes advance and were never willing to sit back and say "well thats good enough."


"RedStateLib-The condition of being a Liberal who finds themselves living in a state that never should have gone to Bush in 2000."
by RedstateLib on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:48:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Reported again (2.00 / 2)

this is completely unacceptable.  Please administrators, ban this person because this is just the beginning of his death threat comments,


by 4justice on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:57:56 PM EST

What? Death threats? (none / 0)

What are you talking about. I missed something.


by catfish1 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:18:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What? Death threats? (2.00 / 1)

Catfish1

You missed it the admins removed a post that basically called on me to die for writing the diary. That is what these posters were responding to. Thanks for your support.


"RedStateLib-The condition of being a Liberal who finds themselves living in a state that never should have gone to Bush in 2000."
by RedstateLib on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:57:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What? Death threats? (none / 0)

You may want to uprate Reaper0Bot0 now that you know that he was responding to a hateful post.


by Destiny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 10:42:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You can vote however you want... (2.00 / 4)

...however it's not blackmail to point out that actions do have consequences.  


Beat McCain!
by thezzyzx on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:58:38 PM EST

Re: You can vote however you want... (2.00 / 3)

Further, Obama supporters (and Obama himself) have NO control over the court if McCain wins.  So it's not as if we're saying "vote Obama or we/he'll take away Roe."  We're saying "vote for the Democratic nominee (probably Obama) or Roe will be taken from us."

That's not blackmail.  It's reality.


Donate to Obama, Today!
by freedom78 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:07:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Values Voter (none / 0)

I am a values voter.  Everyone I vote for HAS to be pro-choice.  After that I parse them out.


I CAN HAZ BAHROCK DONASCHON?
by kasjogren on Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:59:58 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to (2.00 / 6)

As an Obama supporter who has gotten frustrated with Hillary more than a little this campaign season, this past week where the primary has been a little less contentious has been enough for me to remember that Hillary has generally been a good Democrat and a good public servant.  So has Obama.  I hope that time will heal your frustrations that are causing you to consider voting (or non-voting) against your own interest.  If you don't, c'est la vie.  Please try to put it in perspective.


I like baked beans.
by SpideyDem on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:01:19 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (2.00 / 6)

David Addington
Karl Rove
John Yoo
Douglas Feith
Mark Rey
Stephen Hadley
John Bolton
Michael Brown
Alberto Gonzales

Are these better reasons not to take a chance with McCain this time around?


by the mollusk on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:02:23 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (none / 0)

You can vote for Obama, and most likely will.


by Lawyerish on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:03:12 PM EST

Bravo and I agree (2.00 / 1)

If you have faith in the democratic gains in the house and senate, then you know roe v wade will not be overturned. You also know that McCain will have to appoint moderate judges as well because they have to be approved by the democratic senate.

So, I honestly do care about roe v wade, but am not concerned if McCain wins because I do beleive the democrats will sizeably increase their margins in the house and senate.

I would rather control McCain than have my choice rights compromised as some sort of "post partisan" "change" in washington...already Obama has thrown women, gays, working class people, and others under the bus when it suits him.  I actually sense a hostility in him to women, yes even when he's saying "sweetie" (which is another form of degradation).

So, stop trying to intimidate me with roe v wade.


by 4justice on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:05:00 PM EST

Re: Bravo and I agree (2.00 / 1)

You honestly trust this Senate not to approve a judge who will, in all reality, give intentionally vague statements on that issue?

Weren't they supposed to end the war, too?


by rfahey22 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:15:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Better safe than sorry (2.00 / 1)

certainly risky to rely on Congress to protect choice, and definitely not a risk worth taking simply because of childish pique.


by JJE on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:23:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bravo and I agree (2.00 / 1)

I certainly sleep better knowing that we'll have a Dem. legislature to properly check and balance things, but I'd hate to see two years wasted on partisan bickering over judges, and then losing some legislative seats because it becomes a political issue. Plus I care about more than Roe when it comes to the Court. There are lots of other issues they will have to take up in the coming years which would benefit from a balanced court. I don't really want us to dominate it either,  that usually results in a backlash, all things in moderation you know.


by patooker on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:39:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bravo and I agree (2.00 / 1)

Roberts and Alito were confirmed.

Please, oh please think on that.

You're DREAMING if you think a Democratic Senate is enough.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:43:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Moderates? (2.00 / 1)

The platforms of Hillary and Obama are as near identical as any two candidates can be. The tiny differences that there are on domestic issues put Hillary slightly to the left of Obama. Obama has attracted support from a the full range of the Democratic big tent from Michael Moore and Move On to Senator Bob Casey and many conservative Red State Democrats.

As for standing up for workers NAFTA, the deregulation of markets, signing off on manufacturers with sensitive defense contracts being purchased by Communist China all pushed through by the Clinton administration. First Hillary claimed to be virtually Bill's co-president and now since PA she's a  populist running against everything Bill stood for.

Some may have preferred Biden or Edwards or Clinton to be the standard bearer of the party but they didn't win. We do this every 4 years. Half the party does not storm off if they lose the primary they line up behind the nominee and it won't be any different this time.

Come the fall the primary will be long forgotten. Voters have more pressing concerns then whether a millionaire politician whether it be Clinton or Obama made the cut in the primary. They will have moved on. They know that the candidates will have secure futures no matter what. They however are not so fortunate. It's your right to do what ever you want but the vast majority of voters will be focused on their own futures and will be pulling the lever for the Presidential candidate that will best meet their needs.


by hankg on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:19:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I agree (none / 0)

I would rather have four years of McCain than compromise the party with Hopium.


For Obama it now becomes: Faith, hope and CHANGE! And the greatest of these is Change!
by TeresaInPa on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:51:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I agree (none / 0)

Honestly, Teresa, that's the stupidest comment I've ever heard. We haven't "compromised the party" with people like Jim Webb or other former Republicans, have we?
Compromising the party would be voting for Joe Lieberman for president or accepting a Republican as a VP.
But not voting for Obama.
by skohayes on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:55:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Do you see the Irony (2.00 / 5)

of calling Blackmail when Clinton supporters are basically saying, "Nominate Hillary or we will defect."

Pot, meet kettle.

And for those of you who call it threatening.  Stating a fact is not a threat.  A threat is when we say we are going to do something negative (like hit you or something).  What is being stated is a fact and a consequence.


accepting McLettuce is like being 9 years old and forced to eat your own cooking
by Sychotic1 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:08:05 PM EST

the struggle over choice (2.00 / 1)

is also happening more on the state level now not national.  Thus there should be more focus on electing democratic, pro choice people there, and focusing efforts too.  Thus whether McCain or Obama, the struggle will still be on the state level, over which they will not have control.  


by 4justice on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:08:58 PM EST

Re: the struggle over choice (2.00 / 1)

You might want to get your facts just a little bit straighter.  If Roe v. Wade is overturned, the Federal Government could theoretically impose a national abortion ban.  State by state fights are important as well, but if Roe v. Wade is never overturned then states won't even have the option of outlawing abortion.


"We have said since Iowa that this is a race for delegates."
-Howard Wolfson
by belicheat on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:20:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

not entirely true (none / 0)

Federal courts continue to review state laws restricting abortion, and thus the makeup of the Federal judiciary remains relevant to those concerned about the right to choose.


by JJE on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:21:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Which of those other issues is Obama (2.00 / 2)

not infinitely better than McCain on?


by bobdoleisevil on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:22:16 PM EST

There will be blood on your hands (2.00 / 1)

If you don't want to accept that reality then don't, but please don't ask us to censor ourselves by pointing out the truth of the matter.

If McCain wins and you didn't vote to stop him then you are responsible for his actions as President.  End of story.  If you want to pretend your actions don't have consequences then perhaps you aren't the wise old sage you claim to be.


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:24:15 PM EST

Re: There will be blood on your hands (2.00 / 2)

I am willing to accept the consequences of my actions. If Roe gets overturned I will be disappointed, but no as disappointed as I am everyday that people are losing their homes and savings due to medical bills they can't afford. Not as disappointed that people are losing their lives everyday because the cannot afford medical care. Not as disappointed as I am that once again the Democratic Party will fail the people who need us the most.


"RedStateLib-The condition of being a Liberal who finds themselves living in a state that never should have gone to Bush in 2000."
by RedstateLib on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:33:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: There will be blood on your hands (2.00 / 1)

If you willing to accept those consequences then I don't have anything else to say to you.


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:43:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: There will be blood on your hands (2.00 / 1)

Uh, us voting for the Democratic nominee makes us more likely to prevent the things you want to prevent than whatever other thing it is you wind up doing.

I'm not trying to bully you or force you to do anything other than think.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:45:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: There will be blood on your hands (2.00 / 1)

How does not voting for Obama help solve any of those problems you just listed?  You may not like Obama's proposed healthcare plan as much as Hillary's... but it's better than McCain's plan (do nothing).  You might not like Obama's subprime mortgage plan... but it's better than McCain's plan (do nothing).

It is SO ridiculous to say that the Democratic party is somehow "failing" because they just didn't pick the nominee you like.  Look at Hillary vs. Obama on every issue you just listed.  You can barely tell them apart!  

It's not that I don't respect you for supporting Hillary.  It's that you somehow equate Hillary's loss of the nomination with the end of every issue she cared about.  Obama has made those exact same issues the centerpiece of his campaign.  You aren't selling yourself short by supporting a candidate who shares almost all of her platform.


"We have said since Iowa that this is a race for delegates."
-Howard Wolfson
by belicheat on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:50:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (2.00 / 1)

Well, ok. But how about this? A McCain win invalidates all the hard work you put into the cause. The consequence of your actions may help determine if your life's work withstands attack. How much do you care for it? You can't just say, "oh it's someone else's problem now, I care, but can't be bothered anymore I just want to fade into the middle mediocrity".


by notedgeways on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:38:31 PM EST

Its always the same (2.00 / 1)

It all comes back to the same thing. I must have typed, something like, this a thousand times already. we have an enormously important election coming up. We have a divided party. We need a unified party to win in November. Divided, we lose, it's that simple. Hence, we have to talk to each other without threats or insults.

One side has won thus far, and one side has lost, but in reality we are all on the same side. So, to some extent, we have all won, and we have all lost. But none of that is really important, because the real battle starts now.

I think if we put half as much effort into unifying this party as we do into insulting each other, we will be fine.

Ok, I just thought I'd say all this again. I know it probably won't get very far. So, if you desire, go back to all the threats and insults, and if McCain sends you a thank you note, don't be surprised.


Definition of a republican moderate---someone who want's only 50 years in Iraq.
by pollbuster on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:52:56 PM EST

Irrational (2.00 / 1)

Disappointing to see so many apparently dedicated Democrats willing to act irrationally in November if Obama is the nominee.  The level of self-indulgence in hurt feelings is absurd.

"Healthcare, jobs, the mortgage crisis, terrorism, national security, the national debt, record bankruptcies" - these are your important issues?  Then vote on the issues and get over your bruised ego.


by Slim Tyranny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:54:17 PM EST

Though, to be clear (none / 0)

I think that most Democrats talking this talk WILL come out and vote in November.  Widespread irrational voting behavior doesn't seem likely, and people will get over this internal fight in time to get far more pissed off at McCain and his far right wing policies.


by Slim Tyranny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:55:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (2.00 / 2)

Is it just me, or will some of the people on this site do/say anything to somehow justify not supporting Obama in the general election.  Roe v. Wade.... meh.  The Iraq War.... meh.  Some form of attempted Universal Healthcare (yes, albeit without mandates)...meh.  

Politics is about personality, yes.  But I would hope that the issues are really why people are supporting Hillary.  That being said, I just don't see how not voting, or voting for McCain is even an option.  So much about the future of the USA is at stake.  You may not agree with everything Obama says, but the fact that John McCain vehemently opposes every single issue Hillary stands for SHOULD REPULSE YOU.


"We have said since Iowa that this is a race for delegates."
-Howard Wolfson
by belicheat on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:58:08 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs (2.00 / 4)

Wow. you said it for me too. I won't be bullied by this issue. good diary. Rec'ced


by linfar on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:05:53 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (2.00 / 1)

We are taking the reigns, and we're doing it without your help, and often with your active vitriol. The Hillary supporters who denigrate and abuse us younger women voting for Obama are as anti-choice as any Republican, because in their world there is only ONE choice, and it's made by the vagina, not the brain. Note that I'm not talking about all Hillary supporters, only the ones who are coming from a corner, motivated by blind allegiance and abject HATRED of we younger women trying to blaze our own paths.

if I were the type of person to fall into perfect conformity to my elders, I'd be voting for McCain. I was raised by a fundamentalist Catholic. There were aborted baby signs in our barn and I was expected to raise those up too. I didn't fight my way out of that rabble only to be told I need to now surrender my brain to the malicious women who will withhold their support if we decide to take a different route. Out of the frying pan and into the fire, is it?

If you don't want to help, stay home. It's fine. Believe it or not, we ARE strong, and we WILL fight. The kids are all right.


John McCain hates terrorists, except the ones that hate women. Those are just swell.
by terra on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:20:05 PM EST

BRAVA! (2.00 / 2)

I couldn't agree with you more! I will not be blackmailed by Roe v Wade. I will not have Obama shoved down my throat. Nobama, noway.  


by grlpatriot on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:25:54 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (2.00 / 3)

If I come to vote for Obama in November it will not be because his supporters kept beating me over the head with Roe Vs Wade. If I come to support Obama in the fall it will be because he decides to step up and show some real leadership on issues, and not just watered down, weak proposals that fall short of being barely adequate progress, yet alone any real change. I am tired of holding my nose and voting for the lesser of two evils. When Obama shows me he has a pair and will attempt some bold measures that might really improve peoples lives then I will consider him. He needs to stop trying to take the safe route and take a real stand on a real issue. Until that time he is just a better looking John Kerry who will stink up the ballot.


"RedStateLib-The condition of being a Liberal who finds themselves living in a state that never should have gone to Bush in 2000."
by RedstateLib on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:42:32 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade to Blackmail me (2.00 / 1)

I will challenge any Obama supporter to show me 10 controversial battles that Obama has stood up taken action on. Show me 10 times he voted on an issue that required political courage. Whether he was right or wrong on the issue.


"RedStateLib-The condition of being a Liberal who finds themselves living in a state that never should have gone to Bush in 2000."
by RedstateLib on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:51:08 PM EST

Instead of fretting about Roe v Wade.. (2.00 / 1)

this needs to be passed:

Introduced on April 19, 2007 by Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) would preserve a woman's health by safeguarding her ability to make reproductive health care decisions free from government interference. At a time when core protections for women's health are being attacked and undermined, FOCA is essential to guarantee reproductive freedom for future generations of American women.

FOCA would restore the reproductive rights recognized in Roe and help prevent further attacks on reproductive freedom. Congress should enact FOCA and renew its commitment to women's health


by JustJennifer on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:15:47 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe vs Wade (2.00 / 1)

Even if McCain is elected, which I think he will be if Obama is the Democratic nominee, Democrats should increase their majority in the Senate, WHICH THEY CAN USE TO BLOCK APPOINTMENTS.  They could have used their 40+ at any time during Bush's reign, too.  But they didn't.

I'm thinking of voting for Cynthia McKinney.

Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com

Called a stupid, white-trash racist because I voted for Hillary.  When does the Unity start?


by Caro on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:59:19 PM EST

Just vote "present" (2.00 / 1)

That's how Obama has voted on women's issues.


by LA on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:16:14 PM EST

Fine take your ball and go home. (2.00 / 1)

Do you really think your hurting US?


Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win. ~ Sun Tzu
by Tumult on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:17:33 PM EST

Given Obama's need to reach out to the other side, (2.00 / 1)

I wouldn't put Roe v. Wade in his hands. I wouldn't be surprised if he nominated a conservative. And while every Obama supporter is telling us to defend abortion rights by voting for their candidate in November, Congress is still controlled by the Democrats. Do they not still have a responsibility in preventing President McCain from placing another Alito on the bench? I won't be blackmailed, either.


by Rome890 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:31:56 PM EST

Re: Stop Trying to use Roe (none / 0)

Not to mention that in many states now, access to safe, legal abortion is already de facto unavailable.  The Dems have sat by stupified and impotent as Republicans exploit every avenue to thwart women's choice.

Saving Roe won't help us unless Dems grow a spine.

***A


by adrienne4dean on Fri May 16, 2008 at 02:02:19 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.