The unmistakable moment of YOUR political irrelevancy...

...starts here:

I will not, under any circumstances, vote for CANDIDATE X in the general election. I don't care if CANDIDATE X is nominated as the democrat. I'll sit on my hands. I'll vote green party. I'll stick my fingers in my ears and sing Ride of the Valkyries. CANDIDATE X will never be an option for me.

You can leave now, can quit arguing and commenting and writing diaries and handing out recommends because you have become as useful to this webiste as the rotary phone.

Now...

...before you start crying about how you have the right to hold your breath and act like a three year old who can't have a third cookie... YES, I admit that you have the right to hold your breath and act like a 2 year old who can't have a 3rd cookie.

It just won't get you the 3rd cookie.

And more importantly it won't get the rest of us to do anything differently.

We are not going to abandon CANDIDATE X or get on the phone in a frothed panic to tell TurtleDove55 and SillySallySpringer that we can't possibly nominate CANDIDATE X because PissedOffPaula won't vote for CANDIDATE X in the general election.

We'll do what YOU'D do if you heard another adult threatening you... (because the act of repeatedly broadcasting a my-way-or-the-highway stance is absolutely intended to be a threat)...  we'll start to ignore you.

We'll start to roll our eyes when you tell us that CANDIDATE X got KILLED in the West Virginas debate... or when you insist your friends hate CANDIDATE X as well... or when you make what would otherwise be salient points about CANDIDATE X's health care plan, but in this case, just sounds like further grousing. We'll tune you out, not because you're not smart and thoughtful, but because you've already told us that your vote is not in play.

You no longer have a card to play or a move to make or a chit to bargain with, which is the absolute worst possible place to be in politics.

Again, totally your RIGHT... completely legal in every way... just the end of your relevance.

And this isn't a your either with us or your against us screed. Its more that you're either still open to dating or your free to go home and masturbate until something falls off.

The essence of the political process is bartering and after money and sweat-equity the most coveted item is your vote.

The moment you declare your vote off limits... is the moment everyone else stops listening.



Display:


The noise of nothingness... (2.00 / 10)

...is killing my ears.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:02:00 PM EST

You're not God... (none / 0)

Foolish rhetoric, nothing more.


by soyousay on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:04:02 PM EST

God? (2.00 / 3)

Where do I assert anything beyond the fact that the moment you choose not to vote you become politically irrelevant?

That statement is Godly in some way?

OK, but... seems like kinda a small power, no?


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:06:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: God? (none / 0)

"You can leave now"

God-like behavior :D
by soyousay on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:12:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If I could MAKE you leave... (2.00 / 1)

...perhaps, but at this website that right seems to exist with the owners alone.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:14:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If I could MAKE you leave... (none / 0)

So are you saying that you're delusional? Are you claiming to have powers that you actually don't have?

I'm totally amazed and amused. Make me laugh clown :D

Sorry, I got carried away.


by soyousay on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:19:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

(sigh) (2.00 / 1)

Best of luck to you.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:27:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: (sigh) (none / 0)

Thank you, I appreciate that.


by soyousay on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:30:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If I could MAKE you leave... (2.00 / 2)

How does saying "You can" imply an order?


by KyleJRM on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:27:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

How is a person (none / 0)

who refuses to vote for a candidate any less relevant than those who choose to vote for them? It would seem to me that if those who choose to sit it out can cost a candidate an election, their relevance would increase, not decrease.


by georgiapeach on Thu May 15, 2008 at 08:46:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're not God... (2.00 / 1)

Are you talking about the diary, or those who invoke what it describes?  Because your comment to me seems to apply more aptly to the latter.


by The Distillery on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:21:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political irre (2.00 / 2)

I'm confused by your argument. On the one hand, you argue that the right to vote is one of the essential tenets of society yet as soon as someone decides who to vote for -- and it's someone you oppose -- you consider them politically irrelevant?

I think anyone can vote for whomever they want. The vote of someone who disagrees with you is just as important and 'politically relevant' as your own, not less.


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:04:34 PM EST

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political irre (2.00 / 3)

I don't think Lieber is talking about earnest voters of a different stripe in a general election... I think Lieber is referring to folks that readily admit that they share no policy preferences with Candidate Z -- they're just voting for Candidate Z because Candidate X won a partisan primary.

Recall that this diary IS posted on what used to be a partisan website, not on a general CNN, Politico, et al site.


by zonk on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:26:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Read what I wrote... (2.00 / 6)

...not what you'd like me to have written.

Vote for someone else... FINE. Don't vote... also fine. Just don't spend your time telling me and others that you won't vote for candidate X and therefore the rest of us in YOUR party should do... well... anything.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:09:38 PM EST

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political. (1.00 / 0)

I'm starting to ignore you.  You have 1 vote.  Don't presume to tell me what to do with mine.


Have you seen my other site, 777craprepublicanblog? No? Try 777smear.
by ChitownDenny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:10:33 PM EST

I told you what to do with yours? (2.00 / 4)

Where did that happen?

Hmm... lets check the tape.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:11:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He's not (2.00 / 5)

he's just telling you that nobody is interested in your moral vanity.


by JJE on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:12:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political. (2.00 / 4)

Do with it whatever you like.  However, if someone is voting for a candidate based on something other than policy, they're not, by definition, a Democrat.

And that's fine.  But there's nothing at all to talk about if the things that matter to you are all things Hillary and not policy.

It's the Democratic Party, not the Hillary Party.

I expect Hillary could have won the Hillary Primary.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:36:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Ummmm... (2.00 / 1)

wrong.  If enough people are not persuaded to vote for your candidate and instead choose to sit this election out their decision will most definitely be relevant. Their decision will have an impact on the election.

Your failure to understand that says more about you than it does about them.


by k on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:12:14 PM EST

Read the words. The actual words... (2.00 / 3)

...not the words as you think you'd like them to be written.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:15:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Read the words. The actual words... (none / 0)

But it's a little bit hypocritical. You argue that those who don't choose your candidate and spend time arguing why your candidate shouldn't be the nominee and why they won't vote is being politically irrelevant. If it's to you, personally, then that's fine. They are not, however, politically irrelevant in the larger sense of politics, and they are very relevant in the sense that they may also convince others, regardless of whether or not you wish to listen to it.

I just think 'political irrelevancy' is a poor choice of words.


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:19:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm saying that once you announce... (2.00 / 3)

...on a site dedicated to electing Democrats that you WILL NOT VOTE for a certain Democratic candidate you become irrelevant to the discussion. You have no more say going forward, especially if and when that candidate becomes the nominee.

What's so hard about that?


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:22:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm saying that once you announce... (none / 0)

You can say that if you want, but it's just not true. Plenty of people here don't support Obama and are saying they won't vote for him. They have their right to have whatever say that want, including that one.

It's just hypocritical: you say that you don't like people who say 'my way or the highway' yet that is exactly what you are saying to these people: you're irrelevant if you don't support X. You're bashing the very thing you are espousing.


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:37:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (none / 0)

Exactly. It's the American way!


by soyousay on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:15:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (2.00 / 6)

The diarist is right.  People who feel the need to tell us in May that they will never ever ever ever, in a million years vote for Obama are irrelevant.  They are acting out their anger over the fact that their preferred candidate has lost.  That is childish.  Adults, on the other hand, do what is right for the group instead of acting out their anger.


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:17:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (none / 0)

How are they irrelevant? You don't like the decision they made, that's fine, but they're definitely not irrelevant. They will vote as they vote and have as much power as you do -- one vote. They may or may not be acting out of anger, which is their right.


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:20:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Their VOICE is irrelevant... (2.00 / 3)

...as is their ability to effect the discussion going forward... which is what I wrote.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:25:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Their VOICE is irrelevant... (none / 0)

Wrong again. Real concerns/reasons are being expressed and perhaps if you quit telling people they are irrelevant you would be more revelant.


by k on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:32:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Their VOICE is irrelevant... (2.00 / 3)

People who are concerned don't write off a candidate six months before the election.  People who already have their minds made up do such things.  


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:34:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Ah yes, but... (none / 0)

minds can be changed. So insulting them instead of engaging them seems to me to be counter-productive.


by k on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:47:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ah yes, but... (2.00 / 1)

There are many ways to help a person change his mind.  Calling people out on their bullshit is the most effective way that I have found.  If you think investing in someone's emotional rantings is an effective tactic then more power to you.  


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:53:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Well... (none / 0)

Bullshit is in the eye of the beholder.

And I don't think discussing someone's "emotional rantings" is much of an investment. Some people get more exercised than others. Doesn't mean they should be denigrated and dismissed.


by k on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:01:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Well... (2.00 / 3)

Bullshit is in the eye of the beholder.

Sadly, that is a common misconception.  Bullshit is pretty easy to detect.  Especially if you are well versed in the subject matter.  Anytime a self described Democrat claims an Obama Presidency will do more harm to our country than a McCain Presidency that is a clear and unambiguous case of bullshit.  


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:13:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I would love (2.00 / 0)

to continue this discussion but I needed to leave the house 10 minutes ago.

But just a quick thought...perhaps the reasoning is that McCain seems to be one of the more reasonable Republicans (oxymoron anyone). A lot of people seem to be unsure of Obama's positions on issues that are important to them and unimpressed with his character.

And there is way too much anger floating around. People on all sides need to calm down so these problems can be hashed out.

I think it's worth it. I kinda like that unity thing Obama talks about.


by k on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:22:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I would love (1.00 / 0)

Now that is a convincing argument.  :)


Have you seen my other site, 777craprepublicanblog? No? Try 777smear.
by ChitownDenny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:26:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I would love (2.00 / 1)

What exactly are you unsure of Obama about but are sure about McCain.   You can be sure thousand more US soldiers will be dead in a McCain presidency.   You can be sure the number of Americans without healthcare will not go down.   You can be sure Roe V Wade will be overturned once Stevens is gone.  Hundreds more conservative justices appointed to various levels of federal court who will have influence for decades.   You can count on more tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.   If this is what your looking for in the next 4 years then by all means vote for McCain, donate to McCain and campaign for McCain.   For a democrat to have this irrational hate for Obama, who's positions are 95% similar to Clintons, and to then support McCain who is a 180 from Hillary is some mind boggling rationality.


A vote for John McCain is a vote against Hillary Clinton
by realistdem on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:37:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nice thing about being (none / 0)

self employeed is one can cancel meetings at will. Which I did so I will respond.

What exactly are you unsure of Obama about but are sure about McCain.

It seems you are assuming that my comments were referring to my positions. They were not. Quite honestly, I wasn't in favor of either Clinton or Obama so I don't really have a dog in this fight. But my position does afford me the ability to see both sides. Which is why I advocate discussion and not derision.


by k on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:50:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Expressing your concerns and... (2.00 / 2)

...announcing that you will never vote for a certain candidate on a partisan website are two totally different things.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:37:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (2.00 / 1)

They are irrelevant because they aren't acting rationally.  Any Democrat who thinks Obama is going to cause more damage to our county than McCain is taking a break from adulthood and wallowing in his/her anger over Hillary's loss.


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:30:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (none / 0)

Well, then we approach politics from two separate angles. You seem to place party label and party politics above all. I tend to think that it is much more complex. I certainly don't agree with everything the Democratic party stands for. As a whole however I have more in common with the Democratic platform than the Republican party.

So if someone doesn't toe the line, they are acting irrationally? Maybe from a party standpoint, but certainly not from an individual standpoint. Politics is a lot more complex than party.

And there's plenty of Democrats that may simply think McCain would be a better president over Obama. You may not agree with it and you may not like it, but that's the simple fact. Their voice is just as valid as yours.


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:33:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (2.00 / 2)

So if someone doesn't toe the line, they are acting irrationally?

No.  Swearing off a Democratic candidate six months before the election is not acting rationally.  That is a far cry from not toeing the line on farm subsidies or nuclear power.  You don't see the distinction?  

And there's plenty of Democrats that may simply think McCain would be a better president over Obama. You may not agree with it and you may not like it, but that's the simple fact. Their voice is just as valid as yours.

Not on a Democratic policital blog.  We aren't having this conversation in a vacuum.  We are having it on a partisan Democratic website.  Anyone who comes here to proclaim his intent to vote for a Republican is either being a troll or is acting out their anger.  I don't consider such behavior to be valid.


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:52:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (none / 0)

Well, then I can't really argue or agree with you. You seem to be implying that to be a participant on this website one must in effect sign a waiver proclaiming oneself to be voting Obama in the fall. You think this is valid, I think politics is much more complex than this.

You're absolutely right, within the Democratic party, that's probably valid. In the real world, and in the real world where people vote, that's definitely not valid.


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:58:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (none / 0)

No loyalty oath needed.

If there are Democrats out there who aren't 100% comfortable with Obama then I ask them to please bring up their concerns.  Please write diaries and/or comments addressing the issues you have with Obama.  There are many Obama supporters here and elsewhere who would be happy to address those concerns.  If after you have had your concerns addressed you still don't want to vote for Obama then I ask that you keep an open mind and postpone your decision until sometime in the fall.  We have a long time before the election and many things can happen.

The actions this diary addressed were the diaries and comments of those who are vowing to never vote for Obama six months before the election.  The people who write diaries or comments such as this either have their minds made up already or they are throwing a temper tantrum.  I have zero patience for such people.   If these people want me to empathize with their feelings/concerns/problems then they need to address their issues like adults not children.


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:27:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (none / 0)

I think this is absolutely fair enough. I'll be writing one of these diaries soon. Not as an attack, but as a genuine inquiry into some -- what I perceive to be -- weaknesses.


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:54:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I look forward to your diary... (none / 0)

...and again if you'll read what I wrote above its about political irrelevance on this and other Democratic websites. There is no loyalty oath nor are you being told to vote for Barack Obama, but when people here make statements that they won't under any circumstances vote for the Democratic nominee for President they have, in essence, staked out an untenable position that makes them... essentially... irrelevant. I bring it up because the REASON to take that position is only to try and scare everyone else into ABANDONING that candidate, which is blackmail.  


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 08:51:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (none / 0)

"And there's plenty of Democrats that may simply think McCain would be a better president over Obama. You may not agree with it and you may not like it, but that's the simple fact. Their voice is just as valid as yours."

This may be true in some cases.  But in the case of a Hillary supporter saying that she would vote for McCain, (or sit out the elections). With their major differences in every important issue:  War, Ecomony, reproductive rights, etc, and how close she is to Obama on those same issues, to claim that Obama is worse than McCain defies logic, and can be catagorized under the heading of "sour grapes".  With their candidate gone they are literally saying to hell with the issues I feel are important, it has to be my candidate or nobody else


"You might well think that. I couldn't possibly comment"
by xenontab on Fri May 16, 2008 at 09:52:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (2.00 / 1)

So what do you expect?

Do you think I'm suddenly going to "come to my senses"?

Have you experienced a lot of people being swayed by the "vote for my candidate OR ELSE" method?


by zonk on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:28:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ummmm... (2.00 / 4)

That's not what he's saying.

He's saying, and I agree, that there's no point in talking to you if you're declaring in May that you'll not vote for Obama in November, no matter what he does.

You are making yourself irrelevant to the purpose of this website, not this democracy.

Please read what is written, not what you'd rather respond to.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:38:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Interesting (2.00 / 4)

Interesting - I hadn't thought about it from this angle. I think, though, that these threads are all about relevance - we won't see them once a nominee is decided.


by Falsehood on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:22:28 PM EST

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political irre (2.00 / 5)

I'll agree with the sentiment of the diary as the give and take in politics requires reasonable debate and compromise. Heck, I'll go so far as to admit it is 'possible' I would vote McCain. That situation is highly improbable - I couldn't begin to tell you what sequence of events would cause me to do it, but I'm still gonna keep my ears and mind open right up to November.

There is no such thing as a perfect candidate, just like there is no such thing as a perfect person. My first choice this year didn't make it very far. And in 2004 I wasn't excited jazzed up to vote for Kerry, and if a better option had come along I would have taken it and I'd like to think I listened and was as informed and pragmatic a voter as I could be.

P.S. Yes, I'm a Barack voter, but I'm on the record as voting for Hillary if she is the nominee.


by patooker on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:23:24 PM EST

OK, naysayers... (2.00 / 6)

Find me the first person - the first voter - who's shifted their position and you have a point.

All Lieber is saying that this threat has virtually no effect... it draws no new votes, it changes nothing.

At best - it draws in people like me who don't mind engaging in mindless internet discussions.

No one - no delegate, no superdelegate, no voter - is changing his or her mind because a few elements are holding their breath because 'Candidate X' is unacceptable.


by zonk on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:24:05 PM EST

Hey, maybe you should... (2.00 / 1)

...have written this diary.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:26:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hey, maybe you should... (2.00 / 3)

Heh...

I prefer to just poke the tiger from outside the cage :-)


by zonk on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:32:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Tipped and Recc'ed (2.00 / 3)

Wish I had written this diary.


accepting McLettuce is like being 9 years old and forced to eat your own cooking
by Sychotic1 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:40:27 PM EST

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political (1.00 / 0)

OK, Lieber, this is a site that supports Democratic principles.  Not voting for Obama in the GE (oops, not voting for Candidate X), is a right you may not support, but there may be a reason why those on this site would chose to do so.  
In the event that Barack does win the presidnecy, many on this site believe he will have a failed presidency.  He has no legacy from which to judge that his presidency would be successful.  And as such, if this occurs, the Dem party is done!  For multiple Repub terms.  There may be some who think 4 years of McCain is better than 16 years (of more Repubs).
More reasons available for Dems not supporting Obama, but I think this is succinct.
Have you seen my other site, 777craprepublicanblog? No? Try 777smear.
by ChitownDenny on Thu May 15, 2008 at 03:40:57 PM EST

Do you have any reason for this statement (none / 0)

other than Obama is not Hillary?  Consider this she has run two major endevors:  The Health Care initiative in 1993 and this campaign, both failures, both squandered golden opportunities.

How does this project to a successful presidency?


"You might well think that. I couldn't possibly comment"
by xenontab on Fri May 16, 2008 at 09:55:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political irre (2.00 / 4)

if I could rec, I'd rec. It's sad that this is going WAY over the heads of the people who come here looking for what they EXPECT to see, not what's actually there. Tells you a lot of why they are the way they are, doesn't it?

He's saying if you won't vote for a democrat, we have no reason to pander to you. You've taken your vote out of play, so no one is going to bend over backwards for you. He's saying the EXACT OPPOSITE of "let's force you to vote for our guy", he's saying if you won't vote, there's no reason for us to try.

I mean, this isn't rocket science. This is a DUH moment.


John McCain hates terrorists, except the ones that hate women. Those are just swell.
by terra on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:02:15 PM EST

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political irre (2.00 / 1)

But why vote for Candidate X when you can vote for his secret brother, Speed Candidate?

Go, Speed Candidate, go!


by Ray Radlein on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:11:02 PM EST

Tipped & Rec'd (2.00 / 3)

For irreverant irrelavancy.

And, making a salient point.


Anybody got any mixers? - Zaphod Beeblebrox.
by UrbanRedneck on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:14:31 PM EST

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political irre (2.00 / 0)

Lieber,

I'll say it again: "If you don't like what I have to say may I suggest you close your eyes whenever you come across anything I write, rather than trying to demand I not write it. After all that is such a Right Wing tactic telling someone not to voice their opinion because it isn't "Lock Step" with yours!"

Just because a person says they cannot or will not vote for one candidate does not give you the right to dismiss them from this site. This site is about more than just electing Obama President, it is about electing progressive Democrats to all levels of government. So just because someone does not support Obama does not mean they have no interest in supporting the effort to elect other Democrats to office. So perhaps if your "only" concern is Obama you should look for a site to spew your disgust towards anyone who does not fall in line with your group think.


"RedStateLib-The condition of being a Liberal who finds themselves living in a state that never should have gone to Bush in 2000."
by RedstateLib on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:17:47 PM EST

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political ir (1.50 / 2)

Your title pretty much says it all.  

My vote may be irrelevant to you but it won't be to John McCain.

This is where the Democrats pay the price for treating long time loyal members like dirt and young people who just registered as golden.  And everyone does pay a price eventually for their actions.

I'm prepared for four years of McCain rather than remain a member of an Organization that condones the demeaning of myself and other members.  

In 1980 I didn't leave the Republican Party.  The Republican Party left me.

In 2008 I didn't leave the Democratic party.  The Democratic Party left me.


by AC on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:36:26 PM EST

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political ir (none / 0)

There was no reason to troll rate this comment.


by grlpatriot on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:54:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The unmistakable moment of YOUR political ir (none / 0)

so youngers voted more than the older folks and you are bitter about it?  That is how democracy works the person with the most votes win!

politics 101


I would say at this point we're starting to see a little desperation on the part of the woman who I support... NY Governor Paterson
by obamaovermccain on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:36:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

...November (none / 0)

The weather will be cooler in November.

Our soldiers will still be dying in Iraq.
Kids hungry.
Families losing homes.
Jobs moved out of the country.
The earth will continue to warm.

Every vote counts.

Right Lieber?


Open Minds say more than Open Mouths
by redbird50 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:05:53 PM EST

Sure, but if you're announcing now... (2.00 / 2)

...that you won't vote for some Democratic candidate... which is your right... there's essentially nothing to say further until November. That's all. Where this, or any other partisan site is concerned... you're done.


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:14:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sure, but if you're announcing now... (none / 0)

And of course your opinion is relevant because you're trying to accomplish something here??????


by AC on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:23:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes, actually I am. (2.00 / 1)


by Lieber on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:42:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

YOUR mistakable moment (none / 0)

The silence is deafening.


by grlpatriot on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:59:11 PM EST

True. Well put. (2.00 / 1)


Support forced pregnancy? Vote John McCain 2008!
by sricki on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:42:14 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.