On monikers and zeitgeists

Deep thoughts:

It is fascinating to me that the name "John McCain" lends itself to a more damaging moniker than the name "Barack Obama".  On its face, the name Barack Obama, Barack Hussein Obama no less, would seem to lend itself to a myriad of permutations of Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden or twenty other distinctly alien-sounding Middle Eastern names.  This should be tremendous baggage on Barack Obama.  But so far nothing seems to work.  Sure, all the right-wing blowhards emphasize his middle name.  But, really, that's going to get old, if it hasn't already.

But somehow the moniker "McSame" seems more damaging.  I personally don't care for it.  Nevertheless, it seems to capture the zeitgeist better.  People want change, they want George Bush to disappear from the face of the Earth for good.  Plus, the opening "Mc" gives it a certain low-rent cookie-cutter quality like "McMansion" or "McDonald's".  Yes, I know I am reading way too much into this.

Update [2008-6-4 13:30:15 by the mollusk]: OK, I'm going to take this whole stupid observation another step. There's a saying, by Nietsche I believe that "When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back at you." Spooky. But basically his point is that when you focus on an intractable problem, you take on certain attributes of that problem. So with our focus on terrorism and all things middle eastern, perhaps there is an element of popular consciousness that wants a president that at least /sounds/ like they are from the middle east. So having a name like Barack Hussein Obama may not be the hindrance one may predict.

Display:


Re: On monikers and zeitgeists (none / 0)

HAHAHAHA

It does boggle the mind that America could move directly from George Bush, redneck incarnate, to...Barack Hussein Obama.


by animated on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:21:00 PM EST

Re: On monikers and zeitgeists (none / 0)

Never liked McSame as much as McBush.


Nos causidicus Obama , ergo nos non suadeo
by rb608 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:33:01 PM EST

McCain is particularly Nietschian (2.00 / 1)

I know it's a little off-topic, but I've always considered McCain to be the living example of the Nietsche quote, which goes in its entirety:

He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.

McCain has fought monsters all his life.  Some monsters he's beaten, others he's lost to.  Since 2000, the only way he's been able to win is to become a monster himself.

For those followers of Battlestar Galactica, the Colonal Tigh comparison grows ever stronger when you pursue this course of thought.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:40:38 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.